ADDITIONAL MENU
JOURNAL TEMPLATE
TOOLS
INDEXING
INFORMATION
VISITORS
Initial evaluation of manuscripts
The Editor will first evaluate all manuscripts submitted at a maximum of 3 weeks time. Although rare, yet it is entirely feasible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, or are outside the aims and scope of the APJPP. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to experts reviewers for review. It usually took up to 14 weeks.
Type of peer review
Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two to three experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, whether it duplicates the already published works, and whether or not the manuscript is sufficiently clear for publication. The method is blind peer review.
Review reports
Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:
Decision
Reviewers advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board. Editor’s decision is final.
The response of the reviewers will be the basis for the Editor to conclude
An article was rejected for publication due to various considerations, including:
ADDITIONAL MENU
JOURNAL TEMPLATE
TOOLS
INDEXING
INFORMATION
VISITORS
Publisher: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Nasional
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.